I hear this complaint from supervisors and executives all the time: “My employees just won’t take responsibility.”
My experience has taught me that the problem is usually deeper than an employee who simply refuses to be accountable. In many organizations, people have gradually lost their sense of ownership. They come to work, do what they are told, complete whatever is being measured, collect a paycheck, and go home. They may be perfectly capable of doing their jobs, but they don’t necessarily feel that the organization, its customers, its mission, or the quality of its services belongs to them.
That distinction matters.
You can demand accountability from someone. You cannot order someone to care.
Ownership begins when people understand that what they do matters to somebody. The customer matters. The citizen matters. The patient matters. The person on the other end of the telephone matters. The quality of the service matters. When people can see the connection between their daily work and the result experienced by another human being, responsibility becomes much more natural.
Unfortunately, many organizations have become very good at counting things that don’t mean very much.
We count dollars per hour. We count units produced. We count calls answered. We count cases closed. We count hours worked. We count activities because activities are easy to count. But dollars per hour are inputs, not customer-value outputs. The number of calls answered tells us something about activity, but not necessarily whether the caller received what he or she needed. The number of cases closed doesn’t tell us whether the problem was actually solved.
When people discover that their performance is primarily judged by numbers that have little relationship to the value experienced by the customer, they learn something important: the number is what matters.
And so they learn to manage the number.
That is not ownership. It is compliance.
There is another problem that I have seen repeatedly. Some employees are overwhelmed with more work than they can reasonably handle, while others have too little meaningful work to do. Both conditions can destroy ownership.
The overwhelmed employee eventually moves into survival mode. Get through today. Answer this. Finish that. Put out the next fire. There isn’t much mental or emotional room left to think about improving the organization or finding a better way to serve the customer.
The employee with too little meaningful work has a different problem. Work becomes something to occupy time rather than something worth doing. When people cannot see that their contribution makes a difference, they eventually stop looking for ways to contribute.
Neither condition produces ownership.
People also stop taking responsibility when they believe nobody wants to hear what they think.
I have watched employees identify problems that supervisors and executives never saw because the employees were the people actually doing the work. They knew where the process broke down. They knew what frustrated customers. They knew what wasted time. They often knew exactly what needed to change.
And nobody asked them.
After being ignored often enough, people learn not to offer their opinions. Eventually, they stop thinking about the organization as something they can influence. They simply work around the problems.
That is a very expensive form of disengagement.
There is another challenge that organizations are having to confront. Many people are arriving at work with less experience forming and maintaining face-to-face relationships. Technology has made communication easier while, in some respects, making human connection harder. We have become accustomed to immediate stimulation, immediate responses and constant digital distraction. The attraction of the next notification, message, video or other short-term reward can make sustained attention and patient relationship-building more difficult.
Organizations cannot simply complain about this. They have to teach people how to work with people.
And that brings us to supervisors.
A supervisor cannot create ownership in others if he or she cannot communicate effectively. Telling people what to do is not the same as communicating. Neither is sending an email, conducting a meeting or issuing a directive.
Good supervisors explain why the work matters. They listen. They ask questions. They clarify expectations. They give people an opportunity to think. They recognize good work. They address poor performance when it occurs. They help employees understand the connection between what they do and the results the organization is trying to achieve.
Most importantly, they create an environment in which people believe that their contribution matters.
That does not mean allowing everyone to do whatever they want. Ownership without standards becomes chaos. People need clear expectations, clear authority and clear consequences. But they also need enough room to exercise judgment and solve problems.
If every decision has to travel up the organizational ladder, employees quickly learn that responsibility belongs to somebody above them.
Then supervisors complain, “Nobody takes responsibility around here.”
The organization has taught them not to.
So what can an organization do?
Start by asking a different question.
Instead of asking, “How do we make employees more accountable?”, ask, “What would cause our people to take ownership of the work and the results?”
Then look honestly at the workplace.
Are we measuring activity or customer value?
Do people understand who benefits from the work they perform?
Are some employees drowning in work while others are starved for meaningful work?
Do supervisors regularly ask employees what they see, what they would change and what gets in the way of doing good work?
Do employees have enough authority to act on the responsibilities we give them?
Are supervisors capable of having honest conversations with people?
Do our systems reward doing the right thing, or merely hitting the number?
And perhaps the most important question is this:
Do our people believe that they are participants in the organization, or simply employees of it?
There is a profound difference.
Employees do what they are required to do.
Owners look for what needs to be done.
If you want people to take more responsibility, start creating an organization in which there is something worth taking responsibility for.
If you have a problem you’d like to discuss in a confidential, no-obligation Zoom visit, you can self-schedule it by clicking on this button:
Author’s Note: The content provided in this article is designed exclusively for educational and informational purposes, reflecting opinions shaped by decades of leadership training and organizational consulting experience. It should never be interpreted as formal professional advice. By reading or engaging with this material, you acknowledge that no professional-client relationship is established and that these insights do not substitute for tailored guidance from a qualified professional familiar with your specific circumstances. Consequently, readers are strongly advised to seek independent counsel from licensed legal, financial, medical, or other appropriate advisors before implementing any strategies or making decisions based on these perspectives. Ultimately, you assume full personal responsibility for any actions you choose to take or omit as a result of reading this material, releasing the author and publisher from any liability for outcomes arising from your reliance on the text.
